Sheep love being lied into wars and about wars:
Spanish War (USS Maine), WW1 (Lusitania), Cold War (Gladio), Vietnam (Tonkin incident), Cuba (Northwoods plan), Gulf War (Nayirah testimony), Iraq (WMDs).
So now the herd of mind controlled uninformed programmed sheep salivate over the lie of the Iran threat or the ISIS threat .
Why are sheep so dangerously mal-informed?
Ans: The dangerously grossly mal-informing MSM .
Why does the MSM grossly mislead us?
Ans: Because that’s how our owners , the banking corporate monied establishment (the same ones who own MSM) want it .
Why do they want it like this?
Ans: So military piracy and murder can go unexposed!
Where’s the TV documentary: “The Modern History of lies leading to War”?
You’d think it would be an important relevant story, wouldn’t you ?
Especially considering the value of history and the concept of “historical context”?
But no, the herd of sheep are never presented with the dots let alone the chance to join them!
You don’t have a date of publication on your page. Are you updating it regularly? Here’s a good one that is not on your list…
The above needs to be added to your list along with:
They are all false propaganda sites.
jewsnews.co.il is another one, perhaps what you meant.
Don’t know about the last two, beforeitsnews is WAY out there….religious end-times fear mongering craziness.
Fear not. But it is the fool to see danger approaching and does not prepare for it. BIN is a “contributor” site. Where the readers write the stories. You are responsible for vetting the information before you take it as gospel.
It IS end times. And there are thing coming down the line that you will lose your mind when it hits because you didn’t believe anything like it could happen. And why the government and media failed to earn you.
There is no evidence of the claim you make. None.
DAN, stop being a troll & a shill, pal…YOU STINK.
You have no evidence to support your claims.I’m sorry.
I just read some of your hundreds of insane comments…you are one fucked up bitch, you know that? You spew your shit like you are high on methamphetamine, you fanatic, white trash pig.
Trailer trash tweaker.
I’m with you, singing cowboy…you are so calm & relaxed about this – HECK! IT MAKES ME DANG MAD & I’M NOT GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE!…;)L.
DAN STRAYER – ANOTHER NEO-LIBERAL AUTHORITARIAN BENT ON CENSORING EVERY CHRISTIAN/EVERY END-TIMES NEWS site – PAL, YOU NEED to seriously REPENT, PAL.
WAY OUT THERE?…that is certainly ‘JUST YOUR OWN STINKING OPINION’…got that?
Keep writing in caps, you idiotic fanatic, it really increases your credibility….of course, 10 time nothing is still nothing.
The web site you are talking about is 100% bullshit put together by a bunch of delusional fanatics.
There is no evidence to support the claims you make. I’m sorry.
This is crazy. You call ppl trolls. Your the troll. The evidence and facts are right here in your profile. https://disqus.com/by/laynalanguage/ You continuously post hateful comments towards those who don’t share your opinion. I encourage anyone reading this to check it out. (The profile of a real sociopath: https://disqus.com/by/laynalanguage/ ) Go ahead, keep typing…
Not Jews News. They are politically motivated and TRUTH motivated. And that has a likelihood to spread…thankfully.
No it isn’t. They post “gotcha” headlines and contain a lot of false and misleading information blended with legitimate news to make it sound credible. They are an entertainment site like the Onion only they are not funny. JEWSNEWS has been in trouble and sited over and over because they PLAGIARIZED LEGITIMATE NEWS SITES!
FALSE KAMONSENCE…u are another troll bent on CENSORING ANYTHING YOU DON’T LIKE…TOO BAD, TOO SAD…we support JEWSNEWS right to post what they do.
NO THEY DON’T…BEFOREITSNEWS IS A VALID SITE I’VE BEEN READING FOR YEARS…HDLADEE is a TROLL.
If you are still updating the page, please add The Beaverton (thebeaverton.com) to the Satire list, and I believe Facthole is either Hoax or Satire, but I am thinking the former.
THANK YOU FOR CREATING THIS SITE!!
Just about got sucked in to another “satire” (a/k/a LIAR) story at the realnewsrightnow.com site (see story below). These sites usually don’t even have the decency to have a DISCLAIMER or WARNING somewhere on their site to alert people to the fact that their content is LIES and GARBAGE!
Here’s the latest story that ALMOST sucked us in:
From Roy Hobbus, Real News Right Now
WINDOW ROCK, Az. – The U.S. Department of State announced today that it will grant upwards of two-hundred and fifty thousand Syrian refugees temporary amnesty in the United States. Over the next four months, State Department officials working in conjunction with FEMA will begin processing and transporting the refugees to sparsely populated parts of Arizona and North Dakota.
“Due to the increasingly dire humanitarian situation in the Middle East, the United States has agreed to facilitate the transfer of a number of Syrian refugees to the Navajo and Standing Rock reservations where they will be provided with food, shelter, and medical treatment,” Cathy Pieper, a spokesperson for the Department of State, said Friday.
These people also have it set up so that we cannot complain to them, because their CONTACT US page does not work. We tried twice. There should be some kind of laws against this sort of deliberate falsehoods online. Americans have enough to worry about without dishonest stories like this!
Anyway, thank you for this site. Am bookmarking and recommending it to all our friends.
feet2fire…much of this is true…who told you it wasn’t? hmm?…I question YOUR MOTIVES HERE…THE CONTACT PAGE on THIS site, DOESN’T WORK…DUH…THE ‘ENOUGH TO WORRY ABOUT’ is due to LEADER who is working against your best interests and most know that now…please get de-programmed for your own good, pal.
Your motives are the ones to be questioned. You should apologize for your nasty post, “pal.”
As noted in my original post, realnewsrightnow is another of the all-too-many FAKE SITES online. They deliberately mix a few actual facts in with a lot of outrageous BS and call it “satire.” Wake up, dolt! “Much of it is true” also means MUCH OF IT IS B.S.! No wonder people can’t tell truth from fiction any more, with logic/excuses like yours.
–NOW GET OUT OF HERE AND LEAVE ME ALONE.
Fake/Hoax News Websites
Fake/Hoax News sites are satire sites that are not funny. They are an attempt to play on gullible people who do not check sources and will just pass the news on as if it were really true. Below is the list of know Fake/Hoax News Websites:
Cap News (twitter.com/capnews)
Indecision Forever (www.cc.com/indecision)
Make sure to add Beforeitsnews to your very fine list.
Could you check out the following website to see if it is eligible for your list?
They appear to have both real and satire news. Satire is listed under satire so you would need to look at the site to see which category the story came from. It is confusing.
Add FakeNewsWatch as another Constitutional rights destroyer….most likely Jew and CIA
How? They are simply making a list saying which news sites are fake. They aren’t censoring. All the sites are still active. And besides, it only violates the Constitution if the GOVERNMENT violates the protections. FakeNewsWatch is not a government entity, nor do they claim to be.
WRONG, DAN! – BEFOREITSNEWS IS NO LONGER LISTED – DUE TO THIS KIND OF CENSORSHIP…WE DON’T NEED A NEWS SITE POLICE BRIGADE…GO CHASE THE TERRORISTS’ SITES…LEAVE THE NEWS SITES ALONE! IF YOU DON’T LIKE a particular site – DON’T GO THERE!…many more DO!…GET A FLIPPIN’ GRIP, 4 C.O.L.! …AND WHO ARE THEY? F.N.W. ANYWAY?…I don’t need to be nannied, thankyou.
Probably because anyone with 12 brain cells could discern that the site (beforeitsnews.news) is maintained by complete lunatics.
Some people do not have that many brain cells. You are right, that site is one of the worst, total religious/paranoid/fantasy bullshit.
Keep writing in caps….you meth addict. Remember, everyone is listening to you and your profound, insightful statements. Have a nice life in your single-wide trailer.
They also don’t say exactly WHO they are. Their ABOUT US page doesn’t say who they are, or what media outlet or people are behind them…who are these people?
Private-eye.co.uk is NOT a fake/hoax site. ‘The Eye’ is a highly respected magazine with a readership of around half a million people in the UK. It lampoons the news and has done for over 50 years to my knowledge. The Eye does not make up stories to trick people , it is quintessentially British political satire and has been read by those of an independent political bent for many years. Please do not include it in your list.
Perhaps they should add “satire” to this list. If you are writing stories that can be perceived as “real news” why object to being on the list. You may get more readers who are interested in good satire. What is the point of not being transparent to your readership. There are young people doing research and older people who forget. Why contribute to the glut of misinformation? You are entertainment but as “news” you are fake…sorry.
Private Eye does not do fake stories. They lampoon people in the news by writing caricatures of their actions or by pointing up their hypocrisy.All Private eye stories are closely based on fact and all references to hypocrisy are readily evidenced from original sources.
The US does not seem to have any idea what satire means. Every satire site I see in US mags seems to simply make up stories with absolutely no factual basis at all. This is NOT satire – it is lying.
No one says your stories are “fake” only that as a factual ‘news source’ it is fake. My suggestion was to add “satire” to the the descriptor for transparency and clarity. Are you a factual news source? When I read on my internet feed that: Donald Trump says, “I love poorly educated people.” It is important to know if the news source reporting that is a satire site or factual site…it is getting harder and hard to tell with so many sources of information available.
I am not the editor of Private Eye – that honour belongs to Ian Hislop and has done for almost 30 years.
If you check up on him and his publication you will find he has a similar stature in UK journalism to that of Jon Stewart on The Daily Show and Private Eye is a similar mix of news, current affairs and investigative journalism.
The Eye (as it is usually known) has been sued many times but rarely has any of its stories been found to be anything but factual.
The most common stories in the Eye involve pointing up inconsistencies in politicians or opinion formers (news editors, newspaper owners , top industrialists) by printing, verbatim, statements they have made which are mutually contradictory or by juxtaposing actions/statements which show the hypocrisy of the people who did/made them.
Private eye does do fake satirical stories alongside its factual reporting – certainly one of Britain’s best selling magazines should not be included in the “fake” news section.
Many of the big political and economic news stories from the UK were broken by Private Eye. It is a valid news source.
Private Eye is listed in error. The refusal to acknowledge this means that FakeNewsWatch has now rendered itself as just another dubious source of information on the Internet. Oh, the irony! (And I am not associated with Private Eye in any way.)
I admit to being a subscriber and have been to the editorial offices numerous times.
A NEW WEBSITE THAT DEBATES FAKE NEWS
This site is dead and not based on a democratic idea. This is just someones opinion based on nothing more than a domain name.
So why not be heard, seen and have a saying in what is fake news and what is not?
http://www.fakenews.no is a unbiased platform for just THAT debate and nothing more. Its based on just being a forum and that is it.
If you think YOUR opinion on what is fake news and who provides it and so forth, please come on over at fakenews.no to join the debate.
Hear, hear. I think the last issue of the Eye duly noted the sins of this site and asked to be recategorised as a satire mag. Why on earth won’t Fake News Watch respond to a reasonable request? The Street of Shame beckons…
Respectfully, as I understood it FakeNewsWatch suggested the PrivateEye correctly advertise themselves on their site own site to their readers that they are in fact Satire and not news. However, PrivateEye, even though they admit they are satire and not news, chooses not to distinguish this clearly for their readers on their website. FakeNewsWatch maintains their omission leads to the misrepresentation that they are reporting straight and factual news, which they are not. If PrivateEye has no intention of misleading anyone, then they should have no problem being honest and listing themselves on their stories as “satire.” Therefore, PrivateEye is listed correctly here on FakeNewsWatch.
Thank you for your reply, Tina, Kafkaesque though it was. From what you say, it would seem that FakeNewsWatch has unilaterally condemned The Eye as a source of fake news because it has failed to coerce The Eye’s management into plastering trigger warnings all over its articles for the benefit of the terminally-dim. The evidence-free assertion of yours that The Eye prints fake news unjustly maligns a source of serious and worthy investigative journalism as well as satire. I doubt that there is a lawyer, senior civil servant or even Member of Parliament who does not subscribe to The Eye. Your judgmental and one-sided treatment of Private Eye does not appear to extend to its equally-notable French equivalents, the world-famous Le Canard Enchaine, or the more recent Charlie Hebdo. May I ask why?
Canard, I was merely trying to explain what I understood from FakeNewsWatch, about Private Eye agreeing they are satire but not labeling themselves as such. And that I agreed if they are satire they should be clear and up front and label themselves as such rather than present themselves as news. That’s all I was relaying. It was not my personal judgement about what kind of material they have. If I did not communicate that well…my mistake.
Apparently you know Private Eye well. If a website or publication is strictly satirical they should label it as such because unfortunately there are enough people out there who will otherwise take it as actual news. Not all satire is based on sound investigative and factual journalism. Not all satirists are equal. If Private Eye is a complete publication which includes factual investigative journalism, opinion pieces, and satire. Then they just need to identify the sections/pages or articles just as any reputable news publications does.
My response didn’t extend to any other site or publication because, as I said, I was simply responding to your question.
By the way, no need to get personal. ☮️
it is a fake news source when used in that manner to push as fact. Sry, yes may be a fun page, but when used to facts it falls under fake news
There is an obvious disconnect in this discussion between Americans, whose ‘satire ‘ means outright lying and making things up, and everyone else in the english speaking world to whom satire means what it is supposed to mean i.e. ‘the use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people’s stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.’.
Nowhere in this definition does it mention making things up. The ‘Eye’ is a serious, investigative publication which does not make up stories. The Eye uses facts which are verifiable and NEVER uses fake stories. This has been proven again and again in court. In the US it seems to be accepted that you can publish stories which are not true and your 1st amendment will protect you. In the UK libel and slander laws are much tighter and sites which class themselves as ‘satire’ in the US would be shut down in the UK because you are simply not allowed to print lies by law. This is where the disconnect occurs.
You are going to kill “April Fools'” articles by honest papers if we follow your criteria strictly. Also if you read 2 articles in Private Eye, you will realize that it is satire and is useful to get around the unfair application of the “Official Secrets Act” which is primarily used to protect the “security” of bad politicians and government officials and not for the “state..”
I currently run a satire news website, that can sometimes come across as real news, and in an attempt to make sure people don’t mistake my content for real news, I am trying to reach out to some of the watch sites on the internet, so that my website can be immediately identified as not true.
My website is http://www.itaglive.com/
Feel free to read the content and determine for yourself which of the three categories you have listed that it best fits into. I personally feel like it would be best situated in the “Satire” column, but since I don’t know your viewers, I will gladly defer to your judgement.
Thanks for your help in making the internet a safer place.
Thanks for the heads up. It is now included under Satire.
Thank you for your responsible attitude.
I believe Daily Newsbin is another FAKE news site. Please add it to your list. Thank you!
That is one of the WORST.
DailyNewsBin is a news site with a specific political viewpoint. The news in it is not fake but is selected to portray Hillary Clinton in the best possible light.
Daily News Bin also makes many false claims that are unverified and easily debunked. It also tries to pass off editorializing as actual news.
Agreed. It contains no valid references or fact sources in most of the articles.
cbsnews.com.co is another one that just popped up recently.
I’ve not found LewRockwell.com to be a click bate site.
This one is fooling people (unbelievably) and should be on the list. Here is a story on it:
Thank you for your site and this list. I don’t consider myself gullible and I check my facts…or so I thought. I was duped by a Facebook post I believed to be real that was posted by “http://abcnews.com.co”
Most people do not check facts and with the line between what is real being blurred by the world’s crazy events and the speed at which we can spread mis-information, it is more important than ever that there is a source to check “satire” news.
Please add this site to your list:
THE PROBLEM IS, Ann, WHEN YOU ARE BRAINWASHED, to the M.S.M.propaganda matrix…what seems like ‘satire’ to ya, ISN’T!…it’s all a matter of ‘INTERPRETATION’…the LINE is determined by the type of brainwashing you have had – and the NEOLIBERALS ARE MASTERS AT THAT GAME.
Keep writing in caps…everyone is listening to you.
http://womansvibe.com is run by the same guy that does WorldTruth.tv, Eddie Levin, and it is the same basic mix of truth, half truth and completely made up pseudo-scientific science’y sounding assertion fearmongering clap-trap presented as shocking and sensational as possible, of course for the purpose of clickbait.
DON’T LIKE IT, DON’T GO THERE.
One fake news site that I did not see on your list is ABCNews.com.com. It is not affiliated with the actual ABC News. Within their disclaimer at the bottom of each article you find ” Do you have a complaint? We love to hear them! You can call our complaint department directly at (785) 273-0325. Do you have a problem with self-rape? Are you looking to get off the Devil’s playground? Fappy The Anti-Masturbation Dolphin can help! Praise Fappy!”. If you post on their page, one of their admins will change your comments should they not like them. I found this out the hard way when I responded to an article that said Obama just signed an EO that would ban all firearms across the nation. I stated what EO’s were and how they did not apply to civilians but were regulations on how to carry out laws that were passed by Congress. My comment was changed to “Obama is a n—-r!” within seconds. Please add this site to your fake news list.
Correction: That’s ABCNews.com.co (no m)
Their logo and favicon are also designed to look like the real ABC News logo, so it’s clearly intentional deception on their part.
Need to add http://politicalo.com to the satire new sites list.
There’s a typo on the main page! It’s “sow fear”, not “sew fear”. “Sow” is to plant seed; “sew” is to work with a needle and thread!
Some of the sites in the following link I got a long time ago from the Fort Liberty hoax page, and A BUNCH of others are ones that I have come across. ALL are bad sites. You DESPERATELY need to add Breitbart.com to your list of clickbait sites.
hahaha! oh my GOD! NOW, IT’S BREITBARTNEWS.COM?…give it A REST, PAL!…THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE VIEW THAT NEWS SITE – NOTHING WRONG WITH IT…that proves you are a neo-liberal authoritarian site that censors every CONSERVATIVE SITE ON THE WEB.
Sites such as Breitbart.com are more opinion than news. Plus they load their pages with tons of ads because they click-bait threw twitter and facebook. These sites have been fact checked by the masses. These sites are dangerous, misleading to people seeking accurate news.
Here’s a few examples: http://www.snopes.com/tag/breitbart/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News (Notice how these sites use actual facts and references you can locate on the web and verify there origin & authenticity.)
Most ppl who defend & advocate for these type of sites live in a wold of hypocrisy & paranoia. Often the “Their out to get us” type of ppl who commonly have extreme anger towards anyone who opposes there way of thinking. They often take the “misunderstood/censored” victim of circumstance/censorship. They are often quick to get angry and type in caps.
You must be here because you’ve discovered the site(s) you follow have been added to the fake news watch list.
Your inability to control your anger shows how emotionally weak you really are. Fake news sites like Breitbart.com take advantage of people who fly off the handle and get blinded by anger from misleading headlines & stories, refusing to check the facts because the facts go against what your now angry about. This tactic has been a cornerstone of political advertising/campaigning.
‘This is a FAKE news website. It is a Blog. This is a BLOG. News articles may be fake, and should not be used as a real source of information. READ at your own risk, and we are not responsible for who you share the information to/with, or what you do with the information.’
While I generally find satirical news funny, I find websites such as this incredibly poisonous to the pursuit of truth because they are not satirical enough and are being used by people to support their racist/xenophobic agendas. A small percentage of the population has the intelligence or wherewithal to go the extra step to figure out if the story is true.
The article can be found at http://www.hotglobalnews.com/isis-member-found-disguised-as-syrian-refugee-in-canada/#
Thank you for your help.
The THOUGHT POLICE HAVE STRUCK! POLITICAL CORRECTNESS NANNIES THINK WE NEED THEM TO CHANGE OUR UNDERWEAR, every day…lol.
RACIST/XENOPHOBIC AGENDAS?…and WHO ARE U TO TELL ANYONE WHAT TO THINK & WHAT TO WRITE? Do you chase the terrorists on their websites and tell them not to do what they are doing on their sites?!?…YOU’RE PATHETIC…and need MAJOR DE-PROGRAMMING…please, GET HELP WHILE YOU CAN…GO TO Alex Jones Website – INFOWARS – and tie yourself to your computer chair, turn off the lights and all distractions and stay there til you are better…GOD HELP US.
http://news4ktla.com/ is a fake news site. Just saw a post about clear parasites found in Dasani water, pretty obvious hoax and snopes already has debunked it.
SNOPES HAS DEBUNKED IT…LOL…SNOPES IS A FAKECENSORSHIP SITE RUN BY A WOMAN AND HER DOG OR CAT, I HAVE HEARD…THE FARTHEST from A TRUTH SITE ON THE WEB…everyone knows Snopes is a joke!
Tweaker….get your teeth fixed when you sober up.
ClickHole is owned by The Onion (which is on your Satire list.) Why did you list ClickHole as Fake/Hoax instead of Satire, when The Onion is listed as Satire? I realize ClickHole and The Onion are two separate websites, so are you listing ClickHole as Fake/Hoax under your “not funny” criterion or your “[attempt to play on peoples’ gullibility]” criterion? (For the record, I’m not a fan of ClickHole nor The Onion.)
I also noticed that one of the sources for where you get your information from is [ir]RationalWiki, and you don’t list BuzzFeed as ClickBait. Interesting…
Great lists, thank you. Please consider adding to Clickbait list:
The site is VERY HARD to get on. It bugs you incessantly to join:
The actual link is:
http://www.news-two.com/us/jared-fogle-released-from-prison/ <–this is fake and not funny. They also put up other fake things like this one: http://www.news-two.com/local/study-reveals-that-homosexuality-is-extremely-contagious/ (funnier, but still).
The real News Two Atlanta is http://www.wsbtv.com/
is the http://www.departed.co website a fake news website? Check link below
Hello, I’ve just come across an article with the title 4 dead and 12 injured in peterborough on a site called whatshappenednow.com. It reports scary crimes involving drive by shooting and terrorists and upon further investigation on their website, they have repeated the article for most major cities in an attempt to scare people. I think it must be fairly new as I couldn’t find the site referenced in any fake news sites lists so I thought as your contact form does not appear to be working, I would alert you to its presence so that it may join your list.
THANKYOU JASMINE, THE ‘FAKENEWS CENSORSHIP BRIGADE’ NANNY.
Please remove LewRockwell.com from this list, it’s a valid political site carrying essays by prominent libertarian writers. I didn’t go through the entire list but do you have something against libertarian philosophy? Because I noticed a couple other names related to libertarian philosophy, too. Libertarians have a very sound political philosophy, and this year may even have a real shot at taking the presidency, given how hated both the duopoly candidates happen to be. Just make certain you are labeling sites correctly, you absolutely got those libertarian sites wrong!
I SECOND THAT MOTION…what the crap are you doing on this fakesite? NEGATING EVERY CONSERVATIVE ALTERNATIVE NEWS SITE ON THE WEB?
Guess that proves what the agenda is here…LEFTIST/NEO-LIBERAL/AUTHORITARIAN.
Because they aren’t saying what is actually happening in the world. People want to know which sites are spinning and misleading. Sorry. The Libertarians are the top brainwashers in the world. All their sites should be listed.
Hey guys, big prob; The captcha is missing from this form http://www.fakenewswatch.com/contact-us
So how do we tell the ppl at this website that we can’t submit mail because it requires a “captcha” and there is no “captcha” to input?
And how do we tell them about new sites that are fake? Like this one: http://liberaldarkness.com/
Maybe they do not care?
I did a Whois lookup at https://whois.icann.org/en/lookup?name=fakenewswatch.com and it lists the gentleman’s name (Jarratt Linwood), address, telephone number and has an email address listed: firstname.lastname@example.org
He really should have had an email address listed on a “Contact Us” page. Going through Whois seems to be the only way to get in touch with him. BTY, he did renews this website on the 14th of October, 2016 and it expires in 1 year.
Hope this helps.
We really need an updated list. AND, btw, your contact us form is not working because your captcha app is missing.
I can confirm that the Contact Us form is broken…
Found another “satire” site. I’m using this term incredibly loosely because it’s poorly written and unfunny.
http://www.cartelpress.com/ the biggest give away…
Might as well add http://http://peopleoflancaster.com/ to the satire list. They had a story where The Shoe House in York County, Pa was spray painted with the phrase “Black Shoes Matter” (the shoe house is white). People thought it was real.
Private Eye is a valid site and is not solely satire. The magazine consists of 36-48 pages. The first half is news, accurate factual news. the 2nd half then takes the proverbial out of the news.
USANewsflash.com is also a bogus site.
TO CONTACT THIS SITE BY EMAIL…is hilarious…NO ‘CAPTCHA’ – therefore NO SUBMIT…lol…is this site a FAKENEWS SITE?…HERE IS MY LETTER TO THEM –
DEAREST FAKE NEWS WATCH –
I don’t want to be rude – but, who are you anyways, to tell the rest of us what is fake and what is not?
Who died and made you GOD! (YOU NOTICE NO QUESTION MARK AFTER ‘GOD’? IN MY INITIAL RHETORICAL STATEMENT.)
BEFORE IT’S NEWS IS NOT A CLICKBAIT site – I NEVER CLICK ON ADS – I’M THERE FOR THE NEWSTORIES – WHICH I HAVE FOUND – MANY ARE TRUE.
I AM NOT YOUR CHILD – you are not my NANNY – I WILL DISCERN WHAT I BELIEVE IS TRUE not YOU.
PLEASE TAKE BEFORE ITS NEWS OFF THE LIST – WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS WHAT THE GUN CONTROL PEOPLE ARE DOING – it is ESSENTIALLY, THE SAME TACTIC – you are saying – the website MAKES ME CLICK, MAKES ME READ, MAKES ME REACT…BULL CRAP!…I MAKE ME CLICK, I MAKE ME READ, I MAKE ME REACT.
I have been reading that site for years…and have never clicked, willfully, onto any ad on that site, neither has any ad intercepted my reading of any news story on that site.
NEXT, ALEX JONES INFOWARS IS NOT A CLICKBAIT SITE – NEVER HAVE I BEEN HARASSED, PRESSURED OR ANY OTHER, AND I HAVE NEVER HAD ANY OTHER PROBLEMS WITH THAT SITE…I ENJOY THE PROGRAMS AND FIND THEM TRUTHFUL – AND HAVE BEEN WATCHING IT FOR YEARS.
NEXT, DRUDGE IS NOT A FAKE NEWS SITE – BULL CRAP OF BULL CRAP!…it is you people, THAT ARE DELUSIONAL/PROGRAMMED…in short, YOU’RE THE ONES THAT NEED TO BE DE-PROGRAMMED.
DRUDGE HAS BEEN AROUND WAY LONGER THAN YOU HAVE, PALS…HE IS READ BY PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD & HE IS RELEVANT TO THE DAY WE ARE IN.
THIS BLACKLISTING/CENSORSHIP/SLANDER/ NEEDS TO STOP – restore the sites in question here to their former designations – I will report this to those in question.
It appears you are part of the problem, not the solution – you see, there is enough censorship/persecution and dictatorship around the world – we don’t need more, thankyou very much.
FREEDOM IS, AS FREEDOM ‘DOES’…YOU GOT THAT?…to add…since you have no captcha, so can’t submit…why is everyone in the forum, trying to censor every dang site on the net?
What are you the ‘fakenews brigade’ or something?…geez, get a life!
CENSORSHIP IS SO PASSEZ’ – DUMP YOUR STUPID POLITICAL CORRECTNESS – AND HALF THE SITES LISTED ARE GREAT SITES WITH LOTS OF GOOD INFORMATION – ONE BEING ‘BEFOREITSNEWS’ – I’VE USED IT FOR YEARS & HAD MUCH BENEFICIALITY FROM IT IN THE WAY OF SURVIVAL/PREPPING & CURRENT NEWS & INFORMATION…I DON’T NEED A NANNY – I HAVE DISCERNMENT – if you folks need nannies – then, you’ve got a problem.
YOURS, OH SO SINCERELY,
Please add abcnews.com.co to fake news list.
Can’t even send them email because there’s no “captcha” …..and so it’s missing.
Does this site EVER update? Politicops.com is satire…nothing on this site about it.
And add “Real News Right Now” to liars. Snopes has the info;
I inadvertently stumbled on this site that is fake/hoax news: http://abcnews.com.co/
Not only do they “report”, but comments posted are changed and the new post is under the original poster’s name. I posted once that the story was fake and they changed it to a lewd post. They are despicable people.
It is obvious that many, many folks read only headlines and part of articles. They always include some quote from “Fappy The Anti-Masturbation Dolphin” regarding the subject & still folks take it seriously. The most recent has over 450 comments!
My best to you!
http://ABCNews.com.co is a fake news site.
I think you have our website, The Daily Currant, listed incorrectly. If you take a look at our reactions on Facebook and other social media you will find plenty of posts that indicate the readers find it funny. The same is true for the comment section on the website itself.
Examples of these comments include “I’m from Saudi Arabia and when I shared this article to some friends they burst out laughing.” and “LoL — you gave me a genuine laugh. Thanks! ;)”
Often times our readers make jokes of their own, in recognition of our humor. And we’ve also received thousands of emails over the years from readers thanking us for making them laugh. Of course there are people who don’t understand the site is satire. But any dispassionate look at the actual data would show these people are in the minority. Relying purley on media reports for classification, I believe, has led to this error.
Love for you guys to take another look.
Here are some articles to review:
Please consider adding usanewsinsider.com to your list
usanewsinsider.com Claims to be a “Hybrid News/Satire site. But they are currently trapping folks with their fake news.
Yournewswire.com is a proven Clickbait site.
I sent you an email. Can you please add http://www.abc.com.co. It is a satire news site> the real abc site is abc.go.com. Thanks in advance
Please add :http://abcnews.com.co/
I’d love to contact them and ask a question, but it keeps coming back as having errors – that the “captcha” is missing. There IS NO CAPTCHA ON IT!
therightists.com is another satire/fake news site.
Is True Pundit fake? It seems fake.
This appears to be another – Angry American Patriots dot com. No contact, no About Us… totally partisan, not sourced, no editorial masthead…. not news! BUT people believe it. This is important for people relying on these sites for their political perspectives… see http://www.angryamericanpatriots.com
You used “sew” wrong. In this context it should be spelled “sow”. Grammar and spelling is important to be considered a viable information site.
ClickHole is a spinoff of The Onion, and as such is a satire website, not a “fake news / hoax” site. Probably mentioned elsewhere but I thought I’d mention it since it hasn’t been moved.
DrudgeReport.com IS NOT FAKE.
THIS SITE PLACES REAL LINKS TO REAL NEWS ORGS.
ARE YOU ALL THAT STUPID?
YOU ARE IN DANGER OF RECEIVING A SUMMONS FOR A DEFAMATION LAWSUIT.
Please review the URL again. The fake site url is DrudgeReport.com.co.
this whole site is fake… period.
They forgot TheBlaze.
This web-site is a fake – FOX news is a fake NOT Msnbc – it’s OBVIOUS your bias – Good luck!!!!
webdaily dot com looks like a fake news site. At least, I cannot find any ‘true’ article, nor nothing that looks ‘funny’ (ie: saterical), tho on that point I might be biased by the three fights I’ve seen start on Facebook over their articles. Evidence to the contrary will gladly be considered.
Sew fear. And what kind of thread do you use to sew fear? Some combination of lies and stupidity?
The word is sow as in God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap.
You forgot CNN, ABC, Bloomberg, CBN, HuffPost, New York Times, The Guardian… and many more who lied to us countless times, like in the Iraq War or the recent elections: all easily verifiable just by going back and watch their videos and news, checking Wikileaks, Project Veritas, etc.
Oh, sorry, you are not interested in the truth, are you? This is just paid propaganda, right? You haven’t even included a captcha!
You are despicable!
What gives you the right to tell me what you think is fake news? when all the so called Marked news is full of propaganda, this is the end of mainstream media with all their lies and corruption. And the last American election has proved how the likes of mainstream media lied about the votes. It’s too late for you, people will not listen to you anymore.
this site has such an obvious left wing bias. why put sites like infowars in “clickbait” but not salon, jezebel, huffington post, mic, etc? furthermore, who makes the owner of this site the arbiter of what is and isn’t fake? I could make a site called fakefakenewswatch.com and list this site as being fake propaganda.
Are any of your news sources reliable? CNN? Fox? BBC? These are the fake News sources you Zionist troll.
Daily Currant and Clickhole are both satire sites, not hoax sites. Daily Currant (whose name is even a clever fruit pun) is modeled after The Onion and Click Hole is affiliated with The Onion (The Onion frequently forwards Click Hole items on its Facebook page).
In addition, you might want to add Babylon Bee, a Christian satire site that has seen some of its digs at Joel
Not possible to contact the website. No Captha. Not possible to send in mails and not a great list neither.
Not sure how this site can be number one in google at all and not possible to see who is behind it. Looks like a abandoned project.
You for got biggest fake new its(cnn )
Look over year thay lie about have report in warzone and you see green screen in back ground or talk to other report in other city if look in back ground it same background. Thay accuse people of crime and was not even true. And thay been sue alot over years . Thay are biggest fake new out their.
Drudge Report should not be on that list. CNN should be.
It has been brought to my attention that you have listed my website, RedFlagNews.com in your “Fake News Watch.” This is absolutely not the case, and is patently false.
We have been aggregating the news since 2009. Our sources are clearly marked and shared, and can be found here http://www.redflagnews.com/sources/
We also have a strict policy for false and/or misleading stories which can be found here http://www.redflagnews.com/faq/
Thank you for your time and prompt attention to this matter.
Creator and Editor
I cannot Submit the form because of a “The captcha is missing from this form” error. I’ll post my message here:
http://www.bentspud.com is a fake news website. Some of their articles are satire but others are so realistic it’s hard to treat them as parody. Example of fake article:
Example of article I’ve heard from left-leaning publications almost verbatim:
Why doesn’t this site include ABC, CBS, NBC and especially, CNN? Each of these sites have slanted reporting, omitted and/or changed facts and have ignored specific news-worthy events on several occasions. You know, exploding Ford trucks, Iraqi scud attacks, etc.
Dateline (on NBC) was the only one to make the claim (exploding truck), no-one defended them, and multiple resignations and firings occurred as a result — in addition, that happened back in 1992.
The infamous “Pussy Grabbing” tape was from 2005, Trump still became president, and his supporters offered dismissive statements like, “That was so long ago.” and “He’ll be different as President.”
Just making a comparison.
anyone that disagrees with racist nazi party liberals, with be labeled has fake news, these people are freaking out because there narrative is getting rext !!!!@
Captcha is missing so I can’t send this directly to them, but I just wanted to point out that Clickhole is listed as fake news rather than satire. Clickhole is obviously satire, so hopefully this was just a mistake and there aren’t actually people out there who believe that Harrison Ford is recovering from having his face erased by a giant pencil.
why is cnn bbc rt and the rest of the lame stream media not listed as fake news sites, bbc reported building 7 had fallen before it did, cnn faked the polls for various elections, and rt well they employ jonathon pie the social engineer…. ITS HIGH TIME WE STARTED TELLING IT LIKE IT IS
Citing conspiracy websites makes it difficult to take your claims seriously.
pointless comment that has no substance, if your going to talk at me, at least make it relevant 😛
Regarding “bbc reported building 7 had fallen before it did” …
Multiple news outlets made similar, early statements because of conflicting reports. At the time of the report, conflicting information came in that “the building was on fire, bulging, and about to collapse” or had “already collapsed.” — regardless, at this point, it was already on fire, buckling, and was going to soon collapse.
BBC – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI
CNN – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1LetB0z8_o
NBC – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STOJz9qCQ1A
FOX – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFdcPv3XXIMS
Regarding CNN faking polls — it wasn’t CNN who failed to forecast Trump winning the presidency. Almost every poll that was conducted concluded that Hillary would win, and nearly every news outlet based their reporting accordingly.
I do agree with you regarding Tom Walker (aka Jonathan Pie), who’s nothing more than a “comedian” — and that RT should definitely be included on the Fake News list. The fact that it’s funded by the Russian government should be reason enough.
bullshit, it wasnt even hit by a plane, it was a controlled demo just like the twin towers… Fact of the matter remains that the BBC lied, which put them in breach of their charter, simple as that pal 😛
I would like rabble.ca to be included in your list, that is if you are truly not using this list in partisan fashion to discredit news sources that would benefit the left.
Rabble is not credible. Their nastiest attacks upon conservatives usually is backed up by hearsay. That last example was from a reporter who was there for rabble but oddly had no camera and did not record anything. Quite often it is discovered that facts are twisted or simply made up. Their level of reporting is sloppy, intentionally so in order to inflate opinion on the hard left here in canada. They are not a credible news source.
If you can list a site like infowars that has actually predicted many things before they have occurred, then prove your non partisanship by listing rabble.ca as well, if you review their articles many include scathing rhetoric presented as fact with no sourcing (there are some things that are sourced but certain things that are damaging to the reputations of their opponents often relies upon hearsay or vague reference to “credible unnamed witnesses”.
Within your list i see obvious satire sites, some which i really dislike, but i also see right wing sites are highly targeted. I am wondering why breitbart was removed from the list (perhaps lawsuit city on that one?).
Either way i am asking you list rabble.ca, because it has spewed fourth enough lies that if need be i can have the people that i know hunt down literally hundreds of examples of their false and politically skewed, untruthfil reporting whilest posing as journalists
InfoWars is not clickbait. They’ve been doing great investigative journalism since 1996.
Another Fake news website
I noted LewRockwell.com on your list. I check of the site itself and wikipedia leads me to wonder about the correctness of it being listed under clickbait. In this case, one person’s insinuation and/or conspiracy theory might well be another person’s expression of an opinion.
first, thank you for separating them. i do enjoy satire.
second, i admin a large group on facebook so i get to see the clickbait up close and personal all the time. would you like some more for your list?
p.s. the captcha on your contact form wouldn’t come up for me.
The Drudge Report is most definitely NOT a fake or hoax news site.
I do not feel as if —> PrisonPlanet.com / PrisonPlanet.tv <—– are fake news websites Alex Jones is always on top of the latest news with real confirmed reports and more than accurate statements he has interviewed U.S. High ranking Military officials and even spoke with are President Donald J Trump many times about real pressing matters so tell me how can these websites be considered fake news??
this site sees SNOPES as a valid ‘SOURCE’??? M’kay!
Can you provide any instances where Snopes has listed incorrect information?
The Drudge Report is NOT a fake newssite OR a hoax. You are TOTALLY WRONG!!!
You don’t “sew” fear, you “sow” fear, you know, You reap what you “sow”. You don’t sit down with a needle and thread and “sew” fear into anything………..(oh, third column “click bait”)
Private Eye has been around since the 1960’s, it’s just that you need to be British to understand the humour and style.
http://www.oureyeonislam.com/ should be listed
No update since 2016 and the contact doesn’t work… HELLO, ANYBODY HOME???
They failed to put the biggest liars on their list. Theh failed to include ABC, CBS, NBC, & CNN. These guys are caught lying all the time yet they feel these don’t belong on the list which proves this list is pure propaganda. BTW Don’t post a contact us link if you’re not going to allow people to actually contact you!
One big gap here is any way of telling if FakeNewsWatch itself is fake news. This is not a snark; it’s a complaint that the site doesn’t say who is behind it and who is behind them.
Is used by lefty sites all the time to post fake news from, trying to say it is really CNN, they try to make it look like CNN except the contact page.
This needs to be added to the list.
Great website, well done to you all and keep up the good work. However, you do have a glaringly incorrect listing: Private-eye.co.uk. You have put this in the section “satire that is not funny”. This is absurd. Ian Hislop is a very famous person in the UK, and appears on many comedy shows, as well as doing serious TV journalism. He is well respected, and his magazine has a long and respected history of genuinely funny political satire. If Private Eye is not satire, then satire as a concept does not exist !
I have gone after Occupy Democrats multiple times for salacious and exaggerated headlines. For instance, their claim that Trump took down the jobs for vets page, which was still active. And many others. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/occupy-democrats/
I have been trying over and over again to send a message to your website on THREE different servers: Chrome, Firefox and Safari. It will not send because their is NO CAPCHA! Nowhere no how! It says “The captcha is missing from this form”. Your website does not function properly. You need to have your IT team put in the CAPCHA so people can send you messages to ask questions!!
SO – here is my message:
I watch MSNBC all of the time when I am not watching CNN or PBS or BBC or AL JAZEERA NEWS plus local news stations. I really would like to know why you consider MSNBC fake news? Do you think CNN is fake news, too? How about Fox News? I am trying to figure out the political slant that your website has – or (hopefully) none at all. So please get back to me. I am a serious fact-checker who goes beyond what most search for to get the verifiable facts before I share the information. I will also fact-check websites that tell the public which sites are fake news. So, what is the real story about FakeNewsWatch?
Hello – I was excited to find your site, but then saw the information hasn’t been updated in over a year . . .
FAKE NEWS WATCH
Last updated: 01/18/2016
I know that Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow, and Lawrence O’Donnell meticulously check their facts on MSNBC, so I don’t understand why that site has ended up on your fake news list.
infowars.com is understood by every expert I know, to be fake. Why do you have it listed in clickbait? I ask because I question the quality of the data based on this so I’m keen to learn what you think.
Headcramp.com should be added to the list. it’s chaos and a scam. they can’t help but make fake stories and clickbait.
I use your list regularly and was wondering if you ave any plans to update it?